FRIDAY FLICK: 'GAMER'
Starring: Gerard Butler, Michael C. Hall
Directed/Written by Mark Neveldine and Brain Taylor
Review by Timothy Black
This Friday, Tempest Pictures has selected the new Gerard Butler flick 'Gamer' as our victim. It's an action movie that was released just a few days ago, and we've got all you need to know concerning the flick. If you don't feel like reading, then just scroll to the bottom and get the final word, as well as the rating. Or, you could be nice and read the review I slaved over for hours. Your choice.
The Plot:
Gamer is a high-concept action thriller set in a near future when gaming and entertainment have evolved into a terrifying new hybrid. Humans control other humans in mass-scale, multi-player online games: people play people...for keeps. Mind-control technology is widespread, and at the heart of the controversial game is its creator, reclusive billionaire Ken Castle (Michael C. Hall). His latest brainchild, the first-person shooter game "Slayers," allows millions to act out their most savage fantasies online in front of a global audience, using real prisoners as avatars with whom they fight to the death.
Kable (300's Gerard Butler) is the superstar and cult hero of the ultraviolent "Slayers." Kable is controlled by Simon, a young gamer with rock star status who continue to defy all odds by guiding Kable to victory each week. Taken from his family, imprisoned and forced to fight against his will, the modern day gladiator must survive long enough to escape the game to free his family, regain his identity and to save mankind from castle's ruthless technology.
Gamer stars Gerard Butler (300, The Ugly Truth), Michael C. Hall ("Dexter"), Amber Valletta (Transporter 2), John Leguizamo (Righteous Kill, Assault on Precinct 13) and Kyra Sedgwick ("The Closer").
The Ugly:We're taking the Good, Bad, and Ugly backwards today...because that's really the flow of the entire movie.
The first five minutes of the film are just that...ugly. 'Walk out of the theater' ugly. The opening sequence throws you right in the middle of a game of 'Slayers' in action, and we're treated (for the millionth time this century) to a full-on barrage of needlessly shaky-cam, and lightning fast cuts. If you can tell what's going on in the first five minutes, my hat's off to you. Because I couldn't figure it out. The cinematographer apparently decided it would be cool to toss the camera into the air repeatedly during huge explosions and gunfire. Repeat after me please:
THIS DOES NOT MAKE A MOVIE INTENSE. IT MAKES A MOVIE TERRIBLE. If you want an example of good 'battle scene' camerawork, check out 'Saving Private Ryan'. You can at least tell who is who and what they're doing. With 'Gamer', you'll need to slow the camera down to 1/3rd the speed and ZOOM OUT to figure out what's going on.
If you can hold on through the terrible opening scene, then things start to get a little better...if you care by that point.
Other noteworthy nuggets of 'ugly':
Ludacris. But let's be honest...who didn't see that one coming? Oh yeah, Milo
Ventimiglia manages to make a quick cameo in which his fans will immediately lose all respect for him.
The Bad:
After the painful first few moments, the movie gets a bit better, and starts to establish itself as a solid B-Movie, with a few unfortunate issues.
Let's get this straight right off the bat: this is NOT a Gerard Butler flick. Any ladies out there thinking they'll be able to see 'the next Johnny
Depp' in a really heart-wrenching role are going to walk out of the theater in the first 5 minutes. Butler has next to NO LINES for the first half of the movie. Unless you like seeing him brood and stare off screen, or shoot guns...you aren't going to be blown away by his performance.
In fact, the entire first half really pales in comparison to the latter half, leaving the viewer to think that the problem was in the writing. It felt at moments as if I was watching a scene when I wanted to be elsewhere in the story. While the audience is stuck with Butler in
Ludacris-Land, we wish we could be checking in with Society, or the bad guys...but we're forced to sit in on a scene that has its lines ripped directly from every mind-controlling/post-modern/near-future/sci-
fi/minority report film that came before it. Yawn.
Oh, wait...I forgot...it's NOT a copycat routine, because they throw in a lot of cursing.
Y'know...because it's the future. And everyone curses like a drunken sailor in the future. Cause society has changed...cause it's 30 years from now...get it?
Besides suffering pacing problems, 'Gamer' also runs a fine line on content, as it begins to demonize and make fun of its target audience. Think about it: who is going to go watch this movie? Gamers. So why would you portray gamers as overweight perverts who eat constantly. A lot of folks I talked with thought the movie went off track in that respect. Honestly...in a film that has its TARGET AUDIENCE as the TITLE, there's no reason to bite the hand that feeds.
I'm not a 'realism' nag by any means...so I'm not going to mention the obviously over-the-top plot and action sequences, because it doesn't matter to me...but seriously: why would
Kable go to the final face off without a gun? I still can't rap my mind around that. He spends 45 minutes blowing stuff up with automatic assault rifles, and he decides to fight the 'final boss' (no pun intended) with fists of fury? Ah...I'll overlook it.
The Good:
Alright...don't get me wrong: if you can make it through the below-average first half, the rest of the film actually becomes extremely watchable.
The best casting decision by FAR was Michael C. Hall. This guy is seriously one of the most underrated actors in the business. Hall just WORKS as Ken Castle, and the best scenes in the flick are the ones that center around him. Even down to his most minute mannerisms, Hall turns what could very easily be an annoying character into celluloid gold. If we could have spent less time with 'Luda' and more time with 'Dexter', the film would have been much a lot more palatable.
Right about the time Kastle goes to find his wife, the film takes a turn for the best. Each scene is certainly watchable, and oftentimes very entertaining. The biggest problem is that most audience members have lost their interest in the film by then.
The biggest thing that sticks out to me is this: if this film is labeled as a 'Video Gamer' movie, then it's only mildly impressive. BUT...if this film is labeled as a 'Social Commentary' movie, then it takes gold.
This is a hilarious take on what the planet would be like if the 'Facebook Culture' ruled the world for the past 30 years, with no red-haired conservatives standing in the way. Let's be honest: the 'conversations' that take place in this movie could be ripped from any internet message board on the planet...and seeing them acted out in real life is quite entertaining at times. I just wish 'Gamer' could figure out what kind of movie it wants to be.
FINAL SCORE: 70% (C-)Bottom Line: If you can make it through the first half unharmed, then the film starts to make up ground in the final 30 minutes. The only problem is that it can't make the ground up fast enough. By the time the movie is over, you aren't left thinking about the story: you're left thinking about the movie, and how it could have been better...and when that happens, you know something didn't work.
Unfortunately for a lot of Butler fans out there, 'Gamer' was certainly a lot of madness, but it was
not a lot of Sparta.